↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for infantile haemangiomas (strawberry birthmarks) of the skin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas (strawberry birthmarks) of the skin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006545.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo Leonardi-Bee, Kapila Batta, Carol O'Brien, Fiona J Bath-Hextall

Abstract

Infantile haemangiomas (also known as strawberry birthmarks) are soft, raised swellings of the skin which are usually uncomplicated and tend to regress spontaneously over time. Some haemangiomas occur in high-risk areas or can develop complications; therefore, intervention may be necessary. Various interventions have been proposed, but it is unclear whether any of these interventions are effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 58%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,652,413
of 12,406,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,531
of 8,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,457
of 119,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,406,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.