↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004400.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen C Cheng, Dianne P Stephens, Bart J Currie

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,959
of 12,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,197
of 74,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.