Report for: Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps

Title	Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd008361.pub2
Pubmed ID	22258983
Authors	Aleksandar Nagorni, Goran Bjelakovic, Bratislav Petrovic
Abstract	It has been suggested that narrow band imaging colonoscopy (NBI) might be better for detection of colorectal polyps than white light colonoscopy (WLC).

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
France	1	<1%
Canada	1	<1%
Unknown	125	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	18	14%
Researcher	17	13%
Other	12	9%
Student > Bachelor	11	9%
Student > Ph. D. Student	11	9%
Other	23	18%
Unknown	35	28%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	61	48%
Engineering	5	4%
Nursing and Health Professions	3	2%
Psychology	3	2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance	3	2%
Other	11	9%
Unknown	41	32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.

All research outputs

#20,160,460

of 22,669,724 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#11,977

of 12,296 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#222,529

of 245,930 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#228

of 234 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context