↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008361.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandar Nagorni, Goran Bjelakovic, Bratislav Petrovic

Abstract

It has been suggested that narrow band imaging colonoscopy (NBI) might be better for detection of colorectal polyps than white light colonoscopy (WLC).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 48%
Engineering 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 41 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,160,460
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,977
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,529
of 245,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#228
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.