↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006263.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda K Martin, Anna Liza Agero, Victoria Werth, Elmer Villanueva, Janet Segall, Dedee F Murrell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 41 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,861,532
of 21,172,126 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,671
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,672
of 281,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,172,126 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.