↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006263.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda K Martin, Anna Liza Agero, Victoria Werth, Elmer Villanueva, Janet Segall, Dedee F Murrell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 34 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,878,054
of 13,122,094 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,956
of 10,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,062
of 265,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,122,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.