↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006355.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda Cumpston, Renea V Johnston, Lainie Wengier, Rachelle Buchbinder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Other 15 8%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 51 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,959
of 12,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,121
of 109,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.