↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Topical glyceryl trinitrate for rotator cuff disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006355.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda Cumpston, Renea V Johnston, Lainie Wengier, Rachelle Buchbinder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 35 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,795,902
of 15,339,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,597
of 11,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,659
of 268,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,339,681 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.