| Title |
Single dose intravenous paracetamol or intravenous propacetamol for postoperative pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007126.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ewan D McNicol, McKenzie C Ferguson, Simon Haroutounian, Daniel B Carr, Roman Schumann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Singapore | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 20% |
| Unknown | 116 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 125 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,337,226
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,962
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,083
of 348,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.