↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Corticosteroids for viral myocarditis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Corticosteroids for viral myocarditis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004471.pub3
Pubmed ID
24136037
Authors

Huai Sheng Chen, Wei Wang, SN Wu, Jian Ping Liu

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 225 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Other 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Other 48 21%
Unknown 58 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 77 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,334,719
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,928
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,527
of 212,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.