↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemo-radiotherapy versus surgery-based treatment for Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Chemo-radiotherapy versus surgery-based treatment for Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012999
Authors

Yu Yang Soon, Qishi Zheng, Luming Shi, Edwin SY Chan, Cheng Nang Leong, Wee Yao Koh, Ivan Weng Keong Tham

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Materials Science 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,617,329
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,067
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,855
of 329,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#207
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.