| Title |
Interventions to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene for preventing soil‐transmitted helminth infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012199 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew C Freeman, Eric Strunz, Jürg Utzinger, David G Addiss |
| Abstract |
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To assess the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to prevent soil-transmitted helminth infection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Georgia | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 30% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,511,379
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,221
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,054
of 348,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.