↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008602.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shadi Bina, Verity Pacey, Elizabeth H Barnes, Joshua Burns, Kelly Gray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Student > Master 38 11%
Researcher 19 6%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 17 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 151 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 163 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,830,589
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,030
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,747
of 421,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.