| Title |
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008552.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca K Hodder, Kate M O'Brien, Flora Tzelepis, Rebecca J Wyse, Luke Wolfenden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| South Africa | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 602 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 11% |
| Researcher | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 14% |
| Unknown | 263 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 95 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 5% |
| Psychology | 26 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Unknown | 288 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,603,466
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,368
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,300
of 429,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.