↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012947.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anish Jindal, Irene Ctori, Gianni Virgili, Ersilia Lucenteforte, John G Lawrenson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,422,080
of 17,523,006 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,592
of 11,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,303
of 294,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,523,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.