↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Non‐contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012947.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anish Jindal, Irene Ctori, Gianni Virgili, Ersilia Lucenteforte, John G Lawrenson

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 58 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 65 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,196,815
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,752
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,185
of 436,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.