↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral protein-based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Oral protein-based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012616.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Yee Mah, Suet Wan Choy, Matthew A Roberts, Anne Marie Desai, Melissa Corken, Stella M Gwini, Lawrence P McMahon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,025,784
of 17,921,525 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,432
of 11,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,538
of 296,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,921,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.