↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
107 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
Title
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007568.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Ream, Amanda Euesden Hughes, Anna Cox, Katy Skarparis, Alison Richardson, Vibe H Pedersen, Theresa Wiseman, Angus Forbes, Andrew Bryant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 491 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Researcher 41 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 7%
Other 22 4%
Other 72 15%
Unknown 229 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 14%
Psychology 43 9%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 237 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#390,408
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#681
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,725
of 433,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.