↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community animal health services for improving household wealth and health status of low income farmers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Community animal health services for improving household wealth and health status of low income farmers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003049.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Martin Curran, Harriet MacLehose

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,155
of 84,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.