| Title |
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006590.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin WM Vernooij, Michelle Lancee, Anne Cleves, Philipp Dahm, Chris H Bangma, Katja KH Aben |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 32% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 113 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 127 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,061,180
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,292
of 12,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,123
of 401,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.