↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006590.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin WM Vernooij, Michelle Lancee, Anne Cleves, Philipp Dahm, Chris H Bangma, Katja KH Aben

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 35 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#916,307
of 18,812,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,284
of 11,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,198
of 299,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.