↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intrarectal quinine versus intravenous or intramuscular quinine for treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Intrarectal quinine versus intravenous or intramuscular quinine for treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004009.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Eisenhut, Aika AA Omari

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 28%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,190,069
of 16,322,753 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,902
of 11,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,124
of 290,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,322,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.