↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water for preventing urinary stones

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Water for preventing urinary stones
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004292.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yige Bao, Qiang Wei

Abstract

Urinary stones are a common condition characterised by high incidence and high recurrence rate. For a long time, increased water intake has been the main preventive measure for the disease and its recurrence. This is an update of a review originally published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#929,035
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,302
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,559
of 137,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.