↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water for preventing urinary stones

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Water for preventing urinary stones
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004292.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yige Bao, Qiang Wei

Abstract

Urinary stones are a common condition characterised by high incidence and high recurrence rate. For a long time, increased water intake has been the main preventive measure for the disease and its recurrence. This is an update of a review originally published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,153,850
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,645
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,863
of 167,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.