↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007986.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna Gillies, John KH Sinn, Sagar S Lad, Matthew J Leach, Melissa J Ross

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a major problem in children and adolescents, characterised by age-inappropriate levels of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, and is associated with long-term social, academic and mental health problems. The stimulant medications methylphenidate and amphetamine are the most frequently used treatments for ADHD, but these are not always effective and can be associated with side effects. Clinical and biochemical evidence suggests that deficiencies of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) could be related to ADHD. Children and adolescents with ADHD have been shown to have significantly lower plasma and blood concentrations of PUFA and, in particular, lower levels of omega-3 PUFA. These findings suggest that PUFA supplementation may reduce the attention and behaviour problems associated with ADHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 373 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 61 16%
Researcher 44 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 87 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 29%
Psychology 38 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 8%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 102 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#510,761
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#900
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,428
of 178,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.