| Title |
Weight loss interventions for chronic asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009339.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Folasade B Adeniyi, Taryn Young |
| Abstract |
Asthma and obesity are both public health problems with increasing prevalence globally. Several epidemiological studies have shown an association between asthma and obesity, however there is no good quality evidence on the effect of weight loss on asthma control. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 532 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 16% |
| Researcher | 62 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 18% |
| Unknown | 159 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 12% |
| Psychology | 30 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Unknown | 184 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,429,487
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,275
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,785
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.