↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐opioid drugs for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Non‐opioid drugs for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Othman, Leanne Jones, James P Neilson

Abstract

Labour is a normal physiological process, but is usually associated with pain and discomfort. Numerous methods are used to relieve labour pain. These include pharmacological (e.g. epidural, opioids, inhaled analgesia) and non-pharmacological (e.g. hypnosis, acupuncture) methods of pain management. Non-opioid drugs are a pharmacological method used to control mild to moderate pain.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 261 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 90 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Psychology 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 96 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,905,222
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,040
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,814
of 178,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.