Title |
Antiretroviral pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for preventing HIV in high‐risk individuals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007189.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charles I Okwundu, Olalekan A Uthman, Christy AN Okoromah |
Abstract |
More than 30 years into the global HIV/AIDS epidemic, infection rates remain alarmingly high, with over 2.7 million people becoming infected every year. There is a need for HIV prevention strategies that are more effective. Oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in high-risk individuals may be a reliable tool in preventing the transmission of HIV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
Spain | 3 | 11% |
United States | 3 | 11% |
South Africa | 2 | 7% |
Belgium | 2 | 7% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Thailand | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 329 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 71 | 21% |
Researcher | 51 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 9% |
Other | 53 | 15% |
Unknown | 67 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
Psychology | 11 | 3% |
Other | 46 | 13% |
Unknown | 81 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#621,598
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,127
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,005
of 178,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.