↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra‐bony defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra‐bony defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001724.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Needleman, Helen V Worthington, Elaine Giedrys‐Leeper, Richard Tucker

Abstract

Conventional treatment of destructive periodontal (gum) disease arrests the disease but does not usually regain the bone support or connective tissue lost in the disease process. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is a surgical procedure that specifically aims to regenerate the periodontal tissues when the disease is advanced and could overcome some of the limitations of conventional therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 245 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 21%
Student > Postgraduate 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 59 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 65 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,798,037
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,872
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,295
of 85,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.