↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009261.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Norman, En Lin Goh, Jo C Dumville, Chunhu Shi, Zhenmi Liu, Laura Chiverton, Monica Stankiewicz, Adam Reid

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 46 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 47 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,054,581
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,799
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,775
of 434,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.