↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas F Clasen, Kristof Bostoen, Wolf-Peter Schmidt, Sophie Boisson, Isaac C-H Fung, Marion W Jenkins, Beth Scott, Steven Sugden, Sandy Cairncross

Abstract

Diarrhoeal diseases are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, especially among young children in low-income countries, and are associated with exposure to human excreta.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 342 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 20%
Researcher 59 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 21 6%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 62 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Environmental Science 32 9%
Social Sciences 29 8%
Engineering 27 8%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 92 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,812,446
of 17,891,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,140
of 11,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,379
of 135,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,891,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.