| Title |
Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007180.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas F Clasen, Kristof Bostoen, Wolf-Peter Schmidt, Sophie Boisson, Isaac C-H Fung, Marion W Jenkins, Beth Scott, Steven Sugden, Sandy Cairncross |
| Abstract |
Diarrhoeal diseases are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, especially among young children in low-income countries, and are associated with exposure to human excreta. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 369 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 19% |
| Researcher | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 84 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 9% |
| Engineering | 30 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 114 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,106,294
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,659
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,027
of 85,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.