↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hester Vermeulen, Dirk T Ubbink, Astrid Goossens, Rien de Vos, Dink A Legemate, Stijn Joël Westerbos

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 13 10%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 31 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,258,689
of 16,489,850 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,967
of 11,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,938
of 292,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,489,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.