↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hester Vermeulen, Dirk T Ubbink, Astrid Goossens, Rien de Vos, Dink A Legemate, Stijn Joël Westerbos

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Other 15 9%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Materials Science 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 56 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,653,403
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,092
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,371
of 135,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.