RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
@SasaSpasojevic This links to an article on antibody testing. If you're interested. :)
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
So my take is, Science doesn't lie! But even with expanded testing (Which is a good thing) A 8% false negative On people that tested negative is ALARMING
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
Something to think about!
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
"If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would not have COVID-19 (false pos) - 537 people would test negative for COVID-19. Of these, 43 (8%) WOULD have COVID-19 (false neg)." htt
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
RT @cochranecollab: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/QTVoiTtDM…
3/ Despite not having validation of serum antibody testing, it made sense to run the test given the persistence Sx if cough and fatigue. https://t.co/k0NFtRTxtg
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane systematic review (https://t.co/jwV5wEWcyP) that evaluated 54 study cohorts from Asia, Europe, and the US found th…https://t.co/FQDY8PrUlS
What is the diagnostic accuracy of antibody tests for the detection of infection with the #COVID19 virus? https://t.co/YTkYp9j5Tp
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID19の抗体検査の診断精度レビューが出版されました! 感度は非常に低く診断には有用でなさそうでした。一方、症状発症後15日以上経過しての使用は既感染の検出に有用な可能性が高いです。ただ、抗体の上昇期間は不明であり、症状発症後35日を…
@CryptonoteSoci1 @matthew_d_green Source here https://t.co/TmhwuJBGLE
@ASlavitt At seven days, you're about to the point where an antibody test is more sensitive than a nucleic acid test🙁 https://t.co/40QhJYmBKr
“The design, execution and reporting of studies of the accuracy of COVID-19 tests requires considerable improvement.” https://t.co/mLw0eQ7JBZ https://t.co/ZvbC0V3y0u
@RuralOntWoman @GovCanHealth science says that test has problems. https://t.co/hdUfPSIeU3
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/PIunCrXlYb
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID19の抗体検査の診断精度レビューが出版されました! 感度は非常に低く診断には有用でなさそうでした。一方、症状発症後15日以上経過しての使用は既感染の検出に有用な可能性が高いです。ただ、抗体の上昇期間は不明であり、症状発症後35日を…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
Værd at læse ::🙂:: #COVID19dk
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
🔶 TRENDING ON PUBMED 🔶 Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/vAHIxQXtkb #MedTwitter #MedStudentTwitter #Covid19
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.co/nhb9vAxjev) [n=57], diagnostic serological tests (https://t.co/DmUNM6OLSB) [n=40]. All with the same conclusions - primary s
RT @Alicia82mad: Seguimos sin saber: test coronavirus, covid IgG, IgM, IgA,.... https://t.co/tXsmQpTRMW
Seguimos sin saber: test coronavirus, covid IgG, IgM, IgA,.... https://t.co/tXsmQpTRMW
@BallouxFrancois Saw this...Published 6/25/20 “antibody tests... We do not know how well the tests work for people who have milder disease or no symptoms, because the studies in the review were mainly done in people who were in hospital” https://t.co/a3GVa
RT @CochraneLibrary: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/95qFRShB…
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 - Deeks, JJ - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/BCq60XuWYf
@CT_Bergstrom @nanogenomic Cochrane advises against " We are therefore uncertain about the utility of these tests for seroprevalence surveys for public health management purposes." https://t.co/BfUe4DraQj
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
cochrane.org-Quelle est la précision diagnostique des tests sérologiques pour la détection de l'infection par le virus responsable de la COVID-19 ? https://t.co/p5Ie8wbMhK
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
Excelente hilo sobre las pruebas de detección de anticuerpos contra #SARSCoV2
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…