Title |
Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009561.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masako Chen, Sueko M Ng, Esen K Akpek, Sumayya Ahmad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 47 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 27% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 52 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,494
of 421,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.