| Title |
Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of central venous catheter‐related thrombosis in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005982.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Claude Pelland-Marcotte, Nour Amiri, Maria L Avila, Leonardo R Brandão |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 104 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 113 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,063,056
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,316
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,063
of 435,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.