| Title |
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013017.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohajer Hameed, Lorna O'Doherty, Gail Gilchrist, Judit Tirado-Muñoz, Angela Taft, Patty Chondros, Gene Feder, Melissa Tan, Kelsey Hegarty |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 64% |
| Scientists | 14 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 827 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 827 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 95 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 9% |
| Researcher | 71 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 7% |
| Other | 121 | 15% |
| Unknown | 328 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 12% |
| Psychology | 95 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 95 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 8% |
| Unknown | 347 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#563,827
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,052
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,087
of 403,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.