The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006126.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen G Schwartz, Harry W Flynn, Xue Wang, Ajay E Kuriyan, Samuel A Abariga, Wen-Hsiang Lee |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,297,754
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,306
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,811
of 421,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.