↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Less intensive versus conventional haemodialysis for people with end-stage kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Less intensive versus conventional haemodialysis for people with end-stage kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013671
Authors

Jamlick Karumbi, Mogamat Razeen Davids, Emmanuel E Effa, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 80%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,614,683
of 19,149,304 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,326
of 11,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,601
of 299,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,149,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.