↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Less intensive versus conventional haemodialysis for people with end-stage kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Less intensive versus conventional haemodialysis for people with end-stage kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013671
Authors

Jamlick Karumbi, Mogamat Razeen Davids, Emmanuel E Effa, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 73%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,616,469
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,875
of 12,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,698
of 396,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.