↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

(1→3)‐β‐D‐glucan testing for the detection of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised or critically ill people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
(1→3)‐β‐D‐glucan testing for the detection of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised or critically ill people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009833.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra K White, Robert L Schmidt, Brandon S Walker, Kimberly E Hanson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 59 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 60 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,028,501
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,269
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,436
of 429,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.