↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013168.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Henrique DG Sousa, Jose CC Baptista-Silva, Vladimir Vasconcelos, Ronald LG Flumignan, Luis CU Nakano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 46%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,566,400
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,672
of 11,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,140
of 301,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.