| Title |
Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto‐iliac aneurysms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013168.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luiz Henrique Dg Sousa, Jose Cc Baptista-Silva, Vladimir Vasconcelos, Ronald Lg Flumignan, Luis Cu Nakano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,173,449
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,209
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,545
of 430,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.