↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013168.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Henrique DG Sousa, Jose CC Baptista-Silva, Vladimir Vasconcelos, Ronald LG Flumignan, Luis CU Nakano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Unspecified 11 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 35%
Unspecified 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 32 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#11,786,572
of 19,368,131 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,896
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,800
of 306,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,368,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.