↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for treating postpartum depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
368 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
534 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychosocial and psychological interventions for treating postpartum depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006116.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Ellen D Hodnett

Abstract

Postpartum depression is a major health issue for many women from diverse cultures. While pharmacological interventions are an effective treatment for depression, mothers are often reluctant to take antidepressant medication due to concerns about breast milk transmission or potential side-effects. It is important that non-pharmacologic interventions be evaluated for use with postpartum women experiencing depressive symptomatology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 525 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 18%
Student > Bachelor 61 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 11%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 95 18%
Unknown 133 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 25%
Psychology 116 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 10%
Social Sciences 32 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 153 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#270,887
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#451
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388
of 88,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.