↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005333.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ileana Gava, Corrado Barbui, Eugenio Aguglia, Davide Carlino, Rachel Churchill, Maurizio De Vanna, Hugh McGuire

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 23%
Student > Bachelor 49 16%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 62 20%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 135 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 69 22%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 42 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#177,226
of 13,118,813 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#422
of 10,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,992
of 265,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,118,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.