↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005333.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ileana Gava, Corrado Barbui, Eugenio Aguglia, Davide Carlino, Rachel Churchill, Maurizio De Vanna, Hugh McGuire

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 392 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 20%
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 78 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 152 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 19%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 94 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#430,039
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#750
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#650
of 87,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.