↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003645.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna Gillies, Deborah Wells, Abhishta P Bhandari

Abstract

Because of the association of prone positioning with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) it is recommended that young infants be placed on their backs (supine). However, the prone position may be a non-invasive way of increasing oxygenation in participants with acute respiratory distress. Because of substantial differences in respiratory mechanics between adults and children and the risk of SIDS in young infants, a specific review of positioning for infants and young children with acute respiratory distress is warranted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 35 19%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 35 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,396,893
of 16,995,670 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,156
of 11,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,090
of 134,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,995,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.