| Title |
Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011504.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Solange Durao, Marianne E Visser, Vundli Ramokolo, Julicristie M Oliveira, Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Yusentha Balakrishna, Amanda Brand, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Anel Schoonees |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| India | 2 | 10% |
| South Africa | 2 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 516 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 13% |
| Researcher | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 86 | 17% |
| Unknown | 211 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 78 | 15% |
| Unknown | 238 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,726,981
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,403
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,265
of 427,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.