↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long‐term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 13,155)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
548 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
637 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
594 Mendeley
Title
Long‐term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006605.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meredith Noble, Jonathan R Treadwell, Stephen J Tregear, Vivian H Coates, Philip J Wiffen, Clarisse Akafomo, Karen M Schoelles, Roger Chou

Abstract

Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is controversial due to concerns regarding long-term effectiveness and safety, particularly the risk of tolerance, dependence, or abuse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 548 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 7 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 573 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 12%
Student > Master 71 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 9%
Other 48 8%
Other 140 24%
Unknown 135 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 241 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 7%
Psychology 34 6%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 4%
Other 74 12%
Unknown 158 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 784. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#24,574
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42
of 173,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.