@drkellyhenning Among people taking opioids for chronic pain: “minor adverse events (like nausea and headache) occurred, but serious adverse events, including iatrogenic opioid addiction, were rare.” https://t.co/a68o9IOhqw
@Emily_Baum Research puts the number of pain patients who abuse or addict at less than 3 in 1000 (https://t.co/cGQkxlmyLh), yet this is the focus of most treatment. We would like to ask that you avoid preconceptions and tell our story honestly. All the bes
RT @SpicyPurritos: @DrugLiberty4All @quinky_dink https://t.co/f3vMV4NZh1 https://t.co/P2t3jH3dMl also SAMHSA has yearly data that i don’t…
This:
RT @SpicyPurritos: @DrugLiberty4All @quinky_dink https://t.co/f3vMV4NZh1 https://t.co/P2t3jH3dMl also SAMHSA has yearly data that i don’t…
@DrugLiberty4All @quinky_dink https://t.co/f3vMV4NZh1 https://t.co/P2t3jH3dMl also SAMHSA has yearly data that i don’t have a link for but can probably find. last i saw they said ~2M addicted which is less than 1%
RT @Bilked2TheBrink: Opioids for long-term treatment of noncancer pain | Cochrane https://t.co/FRM3jYR95o
RT @Bilked2TheBrink: Opioids for long-term treatment of noncancer pain | Cochrane https://t.co/FRM3jYR95o
Opioids for long-term treatment of noncancer pain | Cochrane https://t.co/FRM3jYR95o
RT @SpicyPurritos: @CDCInjury yes potential being very low https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV SAMHSA says ~2M addicted. do…
@CDCInjury yes potential being very low https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV SAMHSA says ~2M addicted. do the math.
@Sen_JoeManchin Here's the study. See for yourself: https://t.co/cGQkxl4px9
@GhanaboyPharmd @eliano_kacik @PTMcGann And of course this which they don’t accept https://t.co/1IhNR4ozWH
@CDCInjury potential being less than 1%, oh noes! https://t.co/P2t3jH3dMl plus as y’all know. your guidelines have made it much harder for it to be prescribed for CP.
A review of 26 studies showed that only 0.27% of those receiving oral opioids developed signs of abuse or addiction. https://t.co/cGQkxl4px9
RT @NationalPainCo: @DocBearOMD Is there a more recent one than this? The study I shared illustrates the difference in % between CPP w/o a…
@aander1987 The study I shared illustrates the difference in % between CPP w/o a history of SUD & w/a history of SUD. 2010 doesn't include Aberrant Risk % "Signs of opioid addiction were reported in 0.27% of participants in the studies that reported
@DocBearOMD Is there a more recent one than this? The study I shared illustrates the difference in % between CPP w/o a history of SUD & w/a history of SUD. "Signs of opioid addiction were reported in 0.27% of participants in the studies that reported
@GolinoJames @mica_metal_ @jhary_lee @dremilyportermd no they’re actually not. https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt also SAMHSA says ~2M addicted in the US. do the math.
@Irishbrat1966 @ademillo I can add to this: https://t.co/OaE3yW0Jxu https://t.co/4EPKYl7bw2
@RobertC94894966 2) here’s others you can use to: https://t.co/OaE3yW0Jxu
@Christilynn_513 @hope411adcock @totochaos @Loura_Stories @jshearmd @LaurieEngel58 @EspaarDO 3) these studies before the GL’s showed addiction in Pts treated with opioids is about 1% not the 30,40,50% and other made up numbers being used https://t.co/OaE3
RT @SpicyPurritos: @AdamWHanley1 @PTSDAdvocate @BethDarnall @EmpoweredRelief @Surgeon_General using “misuse” to increase % is a bogus examp…
@AdamWHanley1 @PTSDAdvocate @BethDarnall @EmpoweredRelief @Surgeon_General using “misuse” to increase % is a bogus example as even taking LESS than Rx’d is considered “misuse”. this is a better example to use of actual addiction/abuse rates: https://t.co/
For those interested - the Cochrane Library study: https://t.co/iezK202vsA
@KenSycspng @ibdgirl76 @LaurieEngel58 @StefanKertesz @headdock @US_FDA this study says less than 1% https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV
RT @hope411adcock: Long‐term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain "Many minor adverse events (like nausea and headache) occurred,…
Long‐term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain "Many minor adverse events (like nausea and headache) occurred, but serious adverse events, including iatrogenic opioid addiction, were rare." (0.27%) https://t.co/D2wSQ1HM6b https://t.co/Lm4jtTpb5J
RT @SpicyPurritos: @micheome perhaps you should rethink that because it’s a hell of a lot more nuanced than that & addiction rate is still…
@ChuckGartland1 @micheome expect that’s true https://t.co/oj8bpze5mj roughly 2M addicted in the US. do the math 😉
@micheome perhaps you should rethink that because it’s a hell of a lot more nuanced than that & addiction rate is still low. https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV + most that abused didn’t start legally & most ODs were always polysubs
@anhedonic69 @DeorseyMs I'm sorry you don't understand the difference between addiction and dependence, but yes addiction to painkillers is indeed rare. https://t.co/oXM8esXNFY
RT @DocBearOMD: Far, far fewer. The highly respected Cochrane Library of Medicine performed a cohort study of 26 studies, with 4893 partici…
I'd like to repeat this. https://t.co/cGQkxl4px9 Cochrane Library: 4893 patients in a cohort study of 26 studies. Only O.27% had shown signs of addiction. Note - many patients dropped out because they had negative reactions to opioids. It happens - fr
Far, far fewer. The highly respected Cochrane Library of Medicine performed a cohort study of 26 studies, with 4893 participants. Only 0.27% showed signs of addiction. 8% is an unusually high outlier. I would be hesitant to refer to such a study https:/
@alexkorbphd @psychgeist52 the low risk is not a good reason https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt SAMHSA says ~2M addicted in US. do the math. that’s a good reason to let people suffer?
@awaisaftab @psychgeist52 not really https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV lack of evidence is not evidence of efficiency either. ask the thousands of patients taking them long term if they work.
@seemichael @hope411adcock @OpioidHysteria @JoeAllenNewman @GeneW22614687 @LeannRehm except it is true. https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt SAMHSA also says ~2M addicted. do the math. that’s not what they were charged for anyway… but no one
The highly respected Cochrane Library did a cohort study encompassing over 2600 opioid-using pain patients and saw only 0.27% showing signs of addiction https://t.co/pCwwvht6dC
@kiddoisthebest @janevilla023 @TW_Thompson_ https://t.co/9aH1dHaP37 meta-analysis looking over studies of ~4700 individuals, 0.27% https://t.co/p4nk8BAxTj this one is harder, but the important thing is the table and the screenshotted paragraph (OUD = opio
RT @DocBearOMD: A review of 26 studies showed that only 0.27% of those receiving oral opioids developed signs of addiction. I too care abou…
RT @JosephFalzoneMD: Opioids for long-term treatment of noncancer pain https://t.co/vswh4IelPA This meta-study is good in that it agrees w…
A review of 26 studies showed that only 0.27% of those receiving oral opioids developed signs of addiction. I too care about addiction. I just don't want it confused with normal pain relief. https://t.co/pCwwvht6dC
Opioids for long-term treatment of noncancer pain https://t.co/vswh4IelPA This meta-study is good in that it agrees with me; LTOT WORKS. And as I said before we need good studies of longer duration. They concur with me.
RT @hope411adcock: @headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which…
RT @hope411adcock: @headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which…
RT @hope411adcock: @headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which…
RT @hope411adcock: @headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which…
RT @hope411adcock: @headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which…
@GhanaboyPharmd @headdock yes, it comes from this piece https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV however, SAMHSA has yearly data & states ~2M addicted in the US. when the math is done on population rate, it’s also similar. however i also use this study too for non-C
RT @SpicyPurritos: @CanadaPain https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/DrsiORu7dE SAMHSA also has yearly data but u…
RT @SpicyPurritos: @CanadaPain https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/DrsiORu7dE SAMHSA also has yearly data but u…
#CPP yep mr man from OHSU dr Roger Chou how many of the 50 million were in this !?! ZERO who do you think you are !?!
#CPP WTH this from omg I think 2010 and yep Mr man dr Roger Chou from OHSU was involved but WHO the heck of the 50 million Veterans and non veterans being forced off our RXs did they have in the study!?! ZERO
RT @SpicyPurritos: @CanadaPain https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/DrsiORu7dE SAMHSA also has yearly data but u…
@CanadaPain https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/DrsiORu7dE SAMHSA also has yearly data but unfortunately i don’t have the past few years saved, but that’s where the ~2M addicted in the US number comes from.
@headdock Wonder where CPP get the Less than 1%? The Cochrane Review for starters. Unlike the studies you cited which rely on "Questionaires" to determine *potential* Problematic Use. "Signs of opioid addiction were reported in 0.27% of participants"
RT @OpioidHysteria: @BobMark95326037 @GraduatedBen Yes, low. [1] https://t.co/D7osuJtTJL [2] https://t.co/yLRJiCrzNt [3] https://t.co/Xjv3…
RT @OpioidHysteria: @USAtorturesCPPs @Narcocast @life_is_art___ obligatory many sources that say way less than that: https://t.co/oXM8esXNFY
@USAtorturesCPPs @Narcocast @life_is_art___ obligatory many sources that say way less than that: https://t.co/oXM8esXNFY
@lucyshea @bonita_jay1 @DrewQJoseph Of course! Here's some sources :) https://t.co/rszkqLztxl
@dolbyatmos10000 @RobertC94894966 @GasserKellie it’s actually even less https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV
@life_is_art___ Chochrane review disagrees https://t.co/JtXGjrNGie as would https://t.co/PY5feyuuPv But increasing unemployment, public messaging that addiction is inevitable, psychosocial dislocation will all push rates up. opioids become an antidote to
@Dianne37467713 @logosaetos @scrowder actually addiction rate is pretty low https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt SAMHSA also says ~2M addicted. do the math.
@johannagriese "The findings of this review suggest that proper management of opioids can lead to long‐term pain relief for some patients with a very small (though not zero) risk of developing addiction." If reading the whole study it says fewer than 1% ht
@DopesickOnHulu But less than 1% of patients do get addicted to opioids, according to... The BMJ: "abuse was identified for [0.6%] of patients" https://t.co/d6YixRiZXp and Cochrane: "Signs of opioid addiction were reported in 0.27% of participants in the
@NC_updipchick @shelley_bean60 @mommasboyforeva @life_is_art___ @DopesickOnHulu addiction rate studies https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV & as previously mentioned, SAMHSA states ~2M addicted. do the math & quit regurgitating info
@LeahaSla @ZagCreations @kris_lovaas @TheLeadCNN it’s not “highly” addictive. https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV SAMHSA also says roughly 2M addicted. do the math. oxycontin is just ER oxycodone, which is actually one of the “weaker” ones.
@RJessell “Factual data.” Nice. Read the Cochrane Review. It has some “factual data” that conflict with your 25% figure. By a lot. Also, where’d you get your medical degree? https://t.co/AsDiGsd20c
@Ijebuwoman @hamawurfoflove @raesanni less than 4% isn’t “insanely addictive” https://t.co/P2t3jHkPaV https://t.co/f3vMV4wopt SAMHSA also says ~2M addicted. they do a lot of good too. we can’t only focus on harms. but yes street use is very risky these
@advocat41222747 @AjayManhapra @HR4peopleinpain @NitaGhei @StefanKertesz @michaelbmarlin @nabarund My guess is the SPACE trial ¹ as well as longterm studies that have a high drop out rates.² 1. https://t.co/d97evMIBIp 2. https://t.co/WdslkN3Tlv
@Not_So_Cuddles @yoneabuser @Christo41978344 @APFactCheck Eh, I don't agree that it's just semantics because there absolutely is corroboratory evidence. https://t.co/oXM8esXNFY
RT @jacobjamesrich: A whole movie was made to say "Less than 1% of people get addicted to OxyContin" was a lie. Except practically every m…
A whole movie was made to say "Less than 1% of people get addicted to OxyContin" was a lie. Except practically every major academic journal agrees: -The BMJ: 0.6% https://t.co/d6YixR1oyP -Cochrane Library: 0.27% https://t.co/pH0ifaROiV -Oxford: 0.19% htt