RT @hommel_b: Voor wie meer wil weten over de sneltesten, zowel de moleculaire als ook de antigeentesten, de Cochrane Library heeft in een…

@wouterkeller Misschien ook dit eens bekijken https://t.co/k50d6cb3Wl

RT @hommel_b: Voor wie meer wil weten over de sneltesten, zowel de moleculaire als ook de antigeentesten, de Cochrane Library heeft in een…

RT @hommel_b: Voor wie meer wil weten over de sneltesten, zowel de moleculaire als ook de antigeentesten, de Cochrane Library heeft in een…

Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/tAEnqLFTvc

@Florian83616025 @CzypionkaThomas @itosettiMD_MBA @EckerleIsabella @Hopitaux_unige @unige_en The limit of detection for RAT is about 10^5 lower than that of PCR (https://t.co/JfC5RjfEmE), average sensitivity of RATs is 56.2%, of PCR tests it's 95.2% (https

COVID-19 antigen tests may have wide variability in test results w/ avg sensitivity of 56.2% & specificity of 99.5%. Pretest probability pivotal for clinical decisions. Rapid molecular assays are diagnostic & avg sensitivity of 95% & specifici

Čísla k testům jsou průměrné hodnoty pro antigenní testy z https://t.co/UaoYyn4cj2.

In ons @CochraneLibrary review naar sneltesten voor covid-19, is dit misschien wel de meest zekere conclusie: "We did not find any studies at low risk of bias for all quality domains." https://t.co/dVuHlOU0Fb Daarbij .....

Sul punto si veda ad esempio questa dettagliata systematic review sui test rapidi dove si evidenzia come "none of the studies reported included samples from people without symptoms" https://t.co/dKIb4AE0IC

Pruebas moleculares y de antígeno rápidas en el lugar de atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/GBZdXqkrvm https://t.co/yVi31e4Idf

How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/N5b1tQsImU #visualabstract of @Cochrane_IDG systematic review by @em_bouldin @chung_yg @cg_coleman from @EmoryMedicine

RT @systemanalysen: The point which is never mentioned about the rapid AG Tests, you'll see in the Cochrane Review. With a "suitable" str…

The point which is never mentioned about the rapid AG Tests, you'll see in the Cochrane Review. With a "suitable" strategy this will prolongue the "pandemic" rather than stop it. https://t.co/hoxCD1YMk3 https://t.co/j959n5rbiW

RT @Students4BE: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/Ye5jmtz7ZC #visua…

@Cochrane_IDG great! How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit (point-of-care), for diagnosing COVID-19? https://t.co/4YFu1e49BG

How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/Ye5jmtz7ZC #visualabstract of @Cochrane_IDG systematic review by @em_bouldin @chung_yg @cg_coleman from @EmoryMedicine https://t.co/80hFk2nlTt

En resumen, las pruebas rapidas no sirven ni de screening. Nos mintieron y asesinaron miles de personas @MartinVizcarraC @victorzamora Por eso, la lección tiene que ser, tomar decisiones basadas en evidencia y no en temas ideologicos. Una oe a

RT @joaquinfdezoft: Con estos resultados d #Sensibilidad, los #TestRápidosAntígenos para #SARSCoV2 no serían una Prueba adecuada para #Scre…

RT @garycwyo: 44% possible false negatives. 🤔 Abbott BinaxNOW and "cheap paper" lateral flow tests ? still a ways to go before useful fo…

Con estos resultados d #Sensibilidad, los #TestRápidosAntígenos para #SARSCoV2 no serían una Prueba adecuada para #Screening #COVID19

Not enough evidence to support rapid testing for COVID. Studies not reliable enough yet.Thanks @CochraneIreland

Diagram from wiki that shows difference between sensitivity and specificity. https://t.co/MrIBdEoBDM

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

44% possible false negatives. 🤔 Abbott BinaxNOW and "cheap paper" lateral flow tests ? still a ways to go before useful for asympt screening?

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

Rapid molecular testってどんな検査なんだろう？RT-PCRのトリアージって書いてあるから別の検査に思えるけど。 抗原検査は感度よく無いな。

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #vi…

How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/sVB5esZcj6 #visualabstract of @Cochrane_IDG systematic review by @em_bouldin @chung_yg @cg_coleman from @EmoryMedicine https://t.co/w5MnO59ElC

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

56.2% sensitivity of rapid antigen tests? #yikes #COVID__19

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

@profesorPrymula Může to fungovat, když se dobře vysvětlí, jak pro tuto rozsáhlou a rychlou studii postačuje síto s velkými oky.

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #v…

How accurate are rapid tests, performed during a health-care visit for diagnosing #COVID19? https://t.co/VQKWKADhPu #visualabstract of @Cochrane_IDG systematic review by @em_bouldin @chung_yg @cg_coleman from @EmoryMedicine https://t.co/DVFAPy3JBx

Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/ksAVouF3tL De evaluaties van de testen op Covid19 tonen aan dat de testresultaten minder betrouwbaar zijn dan d

@MRogersRN Full review still forthcoming (with breakdowns by brand), but pooled sensitivity and specificity details listed here: https://t.co/gxbKOHiRKo

@smadixit We could have doubled the PCR numbers. We never tried, rather we decided to go to route of tests that is 56% sensitivity in real world although manufacture may claim other wise. मर्नु भन्दा वौलाउनु वेस will learn more as time passes. https://t.co

RT @MariaMarquesDN: "Las pruebas rápidas tienen el potencial de ser utilizadas para informar el triaje del uso de la RT‐PCR, lo que permite…

Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/F9w0O5yIfr

RT @vercheckt: @Karl_Lauterbach Bin im Kern bei Ihnen. Review bestätigt Sie & Drosten: Bei hoher Viruslast (≥10^6?) ausreichend sensitiv. P…

@Karl_Lauterbach Bin im Kern bei Ihnen. Review bestätigt Sie & Drosten: Bei hoher Viruslast (≥10^6?) ausreichend sensitiv. PCR (bald RT-LAMP/CRISPR?) als Bestätigung (nur) bei pos. Erg.! Bin etw. optimistischer: NVM z.B. kann schon 20 Mio. Antigentests

RT @CochraneIberoam: #Evidencia disponible sobre los test rápidos de #antígenos @sanidadgob https://t.co/iYZFlyahz0 https://t.co/TQTksCdl…

"Las pruebas rápidas tienen el potencial de ser utilizadas para informar el triaje del uso de la RT‐PCR, lo que permite una detección más temprana de los que dan +. La evidencia actual no es lo suficientemente sólida como para determinar su utilidad en l

RT @CochraneIberoam: #Evidencia disponible sobre los test rápidos de #antígenos @sanidadgob https://t.co/iYZFlyahz0 https://t.co/TQTksCdl…

Pruebas moleculares y de antígeno rápidas en el lugar de atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/B2FHZaPNPY #AyudaBiblioteca https://t.co/9aNq8BggRT

#Evidencia disponible sobre los test rápidos de #antígenos @sanidadgob https://t.co/iYZFlyahz0 https://t.co/TQTksCdlSi

Bron: https://t.co/61cQF0pZP5

@mirjamjanssen @OlifaNT @815ToNoWhere Ik ook: https://t.co/AQcCbFRblC

@mirjamjanssen @815ToNoWhere @OlifaNT De kans dat iemand valsnegatief test is relatief groot (~85% sensitiviteit). De kans dat iemand valspositief test is zeer, zeer klein. (~98-99% specificiteit). Maar waarschijnlijk leggen ze je niet uit wat dat is bi

RT @guerreroespejo: Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochr…

Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection - Dinnes, J - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/VDVFlhYtA2 https://t.co/6BHB1OBZPe

RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Cómo de exactas son las pruebas rápidas para detectar la #infección por #SARSCoV2 ? Nueva revisión Cochrane que estar…

@davidod021 Absolutely - https://t.co/Z1NZzS53ED

RT @carmenvillarb: Adjunto de nuevo el enlace https://t.co/r14zRAsPGt

RT @carmenvillarb: Adjunto de nuevo el enlace https://t.co/r14zRAsPGt https://t.co/CSq8LnKiHs

@Piti_DUE Se rompió el enlace: https://t.co/r14zRAsPGt

Adjunto de nuevo el enlace https://t.co/r14zRAsPGt

@NjbBari3 @christymaginn @apoorva_nyc Are the nasal swabs the rapid antigen tests? Yeah, their sensitivity is.... not good. An average of 56.2% in this systematic review: https://t.co/0j5iFN8lMu

@HL327 @deeksj Sure - sorry about that! https://t.co/prjR9f53vi

@doccarrie For rapid tests you might be surprised at some... See the systematic review Low quality evidence but... Antigen tests - average sensitivity 56.2% Rapid molecular - average sens 95.2% Xpert Xpress 99.4% (NB, authors note high risk of bias) ID N

RT @richardbody: A recent Cochrane systematic review showed that rapid molecular tests have a pooled specificity of 98.9% At that rate we’…

Lets be careful - that Cochrane review clearly reporting that the studies were shocklingly poor and that the estimates can't be trusted. What tests and lab are the FA using? It wouldn't be the new fangled poorly tested technologies.

A recent Cochrane systematic review showed that rapid molecular tests have a pooled specificity of 98.9% At that rate we’d have expected *23* false positives in so many screening tests @deeksj https://t.co/tMMkNwFZT6

RT @richardbody: A recent Cochran’s systematic review showed that rapid molecular tests have a pooled specificity of 98.9% At that rate we…

RT @richardbody: A recent Cochran’s systematic review showed that rapid molecular tests have a pooled specificity of 98.9% At that rate we…

A recent Cochran’s systematic review showed that rapid molecular tests have a pooled specificity of 98.9% At that rate we’d have expected *23* false positives in so many screening tests @deeksj https://t.co/vgdCImUfOi

@susanmsmith @drbosheaGP There is some, but there's no brilliant evidence for many of them. Key is speed and accessibility e.g. if you need to test a whole year group, or a school. Whole area is moving fast Cochrane here https://t.co/NE7BMhMxck

@Wildlif31387680 @vbaosv Los serologicos no sirven para detección de casos en asintomáticos https://t.co/cYD7zn7Xx3. Revisión Cochrane sobre test antigenico FDA retira autorización a varios test serologicos FDA pulls plug on wayward coronavirus antibody

RT @deeksj: We have published our next Cochrane review of Covid-19 tests: Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagn…

RT @deeksj: We have published our next Cochrane review of Covid-19 tests: Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagn…

RT @CochraneIberoam: La nueva revisión sobre la exactitud diagnóstica de las #pruebas rápidas para el #diagnóstico de la #covid19 ¡ya está…

This cochrane review of preliminary #COVID-19 rapid antigen tests show wide variation in sensitivity and specificity. While Cepheid's Xpert sensitivity was 99.4%, average sensitivity for all tests was poor at 56.2% https://t.co/5RqFRYAmXK

como para determinar su utilidad en la práctica clínica Así que por favor, sigamos siendo clínicos: Primero triaje, sí, pero luego pongamos en valor esos datos Revisión #Cochrane⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/w5p6Sr7dtB https://t.co/wVDQcw5GTd

@thapa_sushil @smadixit @rosh_lal @pandeya_drona @_bishalbhandari @DigbijayMahat @AnupSubedee @drbhatta @Lunabs8 @swarupbaba @nerokoala @BijayaKDhakal There is a Cochrane review “Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐

आम भाषामा कुनै टेस्टको ५०% सेन्सेटिभिटि हुनु भनेको "कोईन टस" गर्नु बराबर हो। "कोईन टस" ले पनि कुल संक्रमित मध्य ५०% लाई त भेट्टाउछ वा संक्रमित नै देखाउँछ। त्यसैले सतर्क रहौं, RDT बाट र फेक विज्ञहरुबाट।

RT @AnupSubedee: सेन्सिटिभिटी (संक्रमितहरूमध्ये जाँच गर्दा कतिलाई पोजिटिव देखाउँछ भन्ने मानक) सरदरमा ५०-५५% मात्र छ। त्यसैले यो टेस्टले आधा…