↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Diao, James M Wright, David K Cundiff, Francois Gueyffier

Abstract

People with no previous cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease represent a primary prevention population. The benefits and harms of treating mild hypertension in primary prevention patients are not known at present. This review examines the existing randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 26 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 384. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#45,015
of 17,953,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192
of 137,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,953,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.