↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assays for active tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assays for active tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013359.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander W Kay, Lucia González Fernández, Yemisi Takwoingi, Michael Eisenhut, Anne K Detjen, Karen R Steingart<sup>a</sup>, Anna M Mandalakas<sup>a</sup>

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 96 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 109 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,492,218
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,095
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,580
of 425,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.