↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Garlic for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Garlic for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007653.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah N Stabler, Aaron M Tejani, Fong Huynh, Claire Fowkes

Abstract

Garlic is widely used by patients for its blood pressure lowering effects. A meta-analysis published in 2008 concluded that garlic consumption lowers blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients. Therefore, it is important to review the currently available evidence to determine whether garlic may also have a beneficial role in the reduction of cardiovascular events and mortality rates in patients with hypertension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 139 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#331,310
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#552
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,605
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.