↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Garlic for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Garlic for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007653.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah N Stabler, Aaron M Tejani, Fong Huynh, Claire Fowkes

Abstract

Garlic is widely used by patients for its blood pressure lowering effects. A meta-analysis published in 2008 concluded that garlic consumption lowers blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients. Therefore, it is important to review the currently available evidence to determine whether garlic may also have a beneficial role in the reduction of cardiovascular events and mortality rates in patients with hypertension.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 30 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#268,198
of 22,462,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#456
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,181
of 147,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,462,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.