↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004834.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariona Pinart, José-Ramón Rueda, Gustavo AS Romero, Carlos Eduardo Pinzón-Flórez, Karime Osorio-Arango, Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-Elkhoury, Ludovic Reveiz, Vanessa M Elias, John A Tweed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Unspecified 18 7%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 84 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Unspecified 18 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 98 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,528,432
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,507
of 12,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,544
of 398,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.