| Title |
Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008652.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Henrique França Gois, Edison Regio de Moraes Souza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 21% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Argentina | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,500,106
of 24,030,717 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,384
of 12,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,312
of 402,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,030,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.