↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high‐grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high‐grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007334.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Bennett, Susi Green, John DeCaestecker, Max Almond, Hugh Barr, Pradeep Bhandari, Krish Ragunath, Rajvinder Singh, Janusz Jankowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 49 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 55 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,095
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,457
of 425,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.