| Title |
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nghia Nguyen, Bing Zhang, Stefan D Holubar, Darrell S Pardi, Siddharth Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,095
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,423
of 476,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.