↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatments for alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Treatments for alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013719
Authors

Monica Novoa-Candia, Guillermo Sánchez Vanegas, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Sergio Vaño-Galván, Mayra Gizeth Urueña Rodriguez, Lucia Giraldo, David Saceda-Corralo, Aurelio Tobias, Jaqueline Tomlinson, Daniel Ortega-Quijano, Javier Zamora

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,687,652
of 18,866,097 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,275
of 11,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,605
of 312,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,866,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.