↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009185.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai J Shaikh, Victor A Osio, Mariska MG Leeflang, Nader Shaikh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Other 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,530,096
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,998
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,488
of 309,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.