↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009185.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai J Shaikh, Victor A Osio, Mariska MG Leeflang, Nader Shaikh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 43 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#13,260,667
of 23,368,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,182
of 12,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,233
of 401,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,368,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.