↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Procalcitonin, C‐reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Procalcitonin, C‐reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009185.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai J Shaikh, Victor A Osio, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Nader Shaikh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 43 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 50 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,659,707
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,103
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,910
of 426,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.